<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business and Twitter: The Top 5 Ways to Damage Your Business on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/index.php/2008/04/business-and-twitter-the-top-5-ways-to-damage-your-business-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>Inspired by Actual Events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:35:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start-ups and Social Media: A Perfect Fit &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/index.php/2008/04/business-and-twitter-the-top-5-ways-to-damage-your-business-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-14832</link>
		<dc:creator>Start-ups and Social Media: A Perfect Fit &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/?p=532#comment-14832</guid>
		<description>[...] launched at DEMO &#8216;08, they researched their market and online communities, started a blog, got onto Twitter and Facebook, and hit the ground running. They also developed online solution center portals that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched at DEMO &#8216;08, they researched their market and online communities, started a blog, got onto Twitter and Facebook, and hit the ground running. They also developed online solution center portals that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shey</title>
		<link>http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/index.php/2008/04/business-and-twitter-the-top-5-ways-to-damage-your-business-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-13697</link>
		<dc:creator>Shey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/?p=532#comment-13697</guid>
		<description>These are excellent points Shannon, especially #2 and #4.    At some point business will start learning to research and plan before they jump into a campaign.

The do it with offline marketing, why not online?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are excellent points Shannon, especially #2 and #4.    At some point business will start learning to research and plan before they jump into a campaign.</p>
<p>The do it with offline marketing, why not online?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Whitley</title>
		<link>http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/index.php/2008/04/business-and-twitter-the-top-5-ways-to-damage-your-business-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-13638</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Whitley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/?p=532#comment-13638</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mike.

I should probably clarify that the company-name accounts are really only a big problem when they are used to indiscriminately follow people, just to get eyeballs on the company&#039;s profile.  As I mentioned above, it can be done correctly, it&#039;s just that most don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mike.</p>
<p>I should probably clarify that the company-name accounts are really only a big problem when they are used to indiscriminately follow people, just to get eyeballs on the company&#8217;s profile.  As I mentioned above, it can be done correctly, it&#8217;s just that most don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keliher</title>
		<link>http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/index.php/2008/04/business-and-twitter-the-top-5-ways-to-damage-your-business-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-13636</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiceoftech.com/swhitley/?p=532#comment-13636</guid>
		<description>One of my clients -- you met him on Monday, Shannon -- uses Twitter personally and has had wonderful business benefits come of it. At the same time, he has another Twitter account, one that&#039;s more associated with his business blog than with him personally, that definitely violates #2 and maybe even #1. The difference is, I guess, that we know that. &quot;Rules are meant to be broken by those who have a reason for breaking them&quot; and whatnot.

At the same time, we know that the conversational value of the company-named account is limited, and we&#039;re not pushy with it. It is what it is, and that&#039;s fine.

I think the true problems come when someone&#039;s violating a few of your guidelines above AND trying to barge in on what are usually personal, friendly conversations and interactions on Twitter.

(Additionally, our firm has a &quot;corporate Twitter account&quot; the violates a couple of your items above, as well. Again, we know that, but we&#039;re not using it to be conversational. We&#039;re using it to sort of demonstrate a point of the technology - how it shows what people are up to right now - and to show off what we&#039;re doing right now by publishing the tweets on our home page. And that&#039;s the sole purpose. If we had 0 followers, it&#039;d be fine, but we actually have a few.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my clients &#8212; you met him on Monday, Shannon &#8212; uses Twitter personally and has had wonderful business benefits come of it. At the same time, he has another Twitter account, one that&#8217;s more associated with his business blog than with him personally, that definitely violates #2 and maybe even #1. The difference is, I guess, that we know that. &#8220;Rules are meant to be broken by those who have a reason for breaking them&#8221; and whatnot.</p>
<p>At the same time, we know that the conversational value of the company-named account is limited, and we&#8217;re not pushy with it. It is what it is, and that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>I think the true problems come when someone&#8217;s violating a few of your guidelines above AND trying to barge in on what are usually personal, friendly conversations and interactions on Twitter.</p>
<p>(Additionally, our firm has a &#8220;corporate Twitter account&#8221; the violates a couple of your items above, as well. Again, we know that, but we&#8217;re not using it to be conversational. We&#8217;re using it to sort of demonstrate a point of the technology &#8211; how it shows what people are up to right now &#8211; and to show off what we&#8217;re doing right now by publishing the tweets on our home page. And that&#8217;s the sole purpose. If we had 0 followers, it&#8217;d be fine, but we actually have a few.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
